JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)February 19, 1998Full bench

C-036 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓
Topic · hard data
O.P. Al Proyecto De Ley N° 05/95 024/95 084/95 Camara Acumulado Y 10/96 Senado. Se Desarrolla El Art. 88 De La C.P. Acciones Populares Y De Grupo. Sent Inhibitoria Y Objeciones Infundadas.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion Popular
  • Legitimación para establecer acciones individuales
  • Ausentes interesados
  • Vulneración de derechos en cualquier tiempo
Derecho De Peticion
  • Acción independiente
4 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 05/95. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionLey 05/95DECLINED TO RULE
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. Primero. INHIBIRSE de conocer de las objeciones contra los articulos 2, 8 y 87 del proyecto de ley Ndeg 05/95-024/95-084/95 Camara acumulado - 10/96 Senado "Por la cual se desarrolla el articulo 88 de la Constitucion Politica de Colombia en relacion con el ejercicio de las Acciones Populares y de Grupo y se dictan otras disposiciones".
  4. Segundo. DECLARAR INFUNDADAS las objeciones contra los articulos 9 y 49 del proyecto de ley Ndeg 05/95-024/95-084/95 Camara acumulado - 10/96 Senado "Por la cual se desarrolla el articulo 88 de la Constitucion Politica de Colombia en relacion con el ejercicio de las Acciones Populares y de Grupo y se dictan otras disposiciones".
  5. Tercero. Dese aplicacion a lo previsto en el articulo 167 de la Constitucion.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.