JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 1, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Nixon Torres Carcamo

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Suplica Contra El Auto Del 4 De Octubre De 2006 De Rechazo De La Demanda. Negado
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Rechazo Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Corrección de demanda no se ajustó a auto inadmisorio
  • Incumplimiento del requisito de certeza
  • Existencia de cosa juzgada
1 topic · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Denegar el recurso de suplica interpuesto por el ciudadano Nixon Torres Carcamo, contra el auto del 4 de octubre de 2006, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda por el presentada para que se declarara la inexequibilidad parcial del articulo 55 de la Ley 50 de 1990.
  2. En firme este auto, contra el cual no procede recurso alguno, archivese el expediente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.