JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 5, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Pedro Abraham Roa Sarmiento

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Suplica Contra El Auto Del 9 De Noviembre De 2005 Mediante El Cual Se Rechazo La Demanda Contra El Articulo 38 (Parcial) De La Ley 715 De 2001. Confirma El Auto De Rechazo De La Demanda
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. CONFIRMAR por las razones expuestas en esta providencia la decision contenida en el numeral
  2. primero. del auto del nueve (9) de noviembre de dos mil cinco (2005), por la cual se rechazo la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Pedro Abraham Roa Sarmiento contra los incisos 4o, 5o y 6o del articulo 38 de la Ley 715 de 2001 "Por la cual se dictan normas organicas en materia de recursos y competencias de conformidad con los articulos 151, 288, 356 Y 357 (Acto Legislativo 01 de 2001) de la Constitucion Politica y se dictan otras disposiciones para organizar la prestacion de los servicios de educacion y salud, entre otros."
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.