A- de 1997
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía
✓Claimant Daniel Baron Castañeda
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Improcedencia de aclaración
- Razones de la petición
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
No accedió a la petición presentada por el accionante, toda vez que la Corte consideró Corte no es competente para aclarar sentencias; tampoco es instancia para reconsiderar una decisión tomada en una sentencia.
Si el peticionario solicita que la Sala Plena declare la nulidad de una sentencia dictada por una Sala de Revisión, solicitud excepcional, debe exponer las razones de tal petición.
Cuando así se ha procedido, la Corte ha analizado los hechos y las razones jurídicas base de la supuesta nulidad de la sentencia.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- RESUELVE :
- No acceder a la petición presentada por el ciudadano Daniel Barón Castañeda.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.