JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 2, 2000

T-990 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Margarita Madrid Solis Y Otro Vs. Instituto De Suguros Sociales Y Otro (Valle)

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos De La Mujer A La Seguridad Social Y A La Salud. Licencia De Maternidad De Madres Comunitarias. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Hogares Comunitarios
  • Vínculo contractual
Madre Comunitaria
  • Vínculo contractual
  • Inexistencia de contrato laboral
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (7 points)
  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR las siguientes sentencias:
  2. 1) La proferida por el Juzgado
  3. Segundo. Penal del Circuito de Buenaventura (Valle), el 27 de enero del 2000, dentro de la accion de tutela promovida por Margarita Madrid Solis, expediente No. T-298609.
  4. 2) La proferida por la Sala de Casacion Laboral de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, el 14 de marzo del 2000, dentro de la accion de tutela promovida por Martha Liliana Valdez Acosta y Claudia Patricia Azcarate Bejarano, expediente T-309976.
  5. 3) La proferida por el Juzgado
  6. Primero. Civil del Circuito de Ocana (Norte de Santander), el 13 de marzo del 2000, dentro de la accion de tutela promovida por Erenia Lopez Ruedas, expediente T-310294.
  7. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 de Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.