JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 31, 2002

T-938 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Gabriel Antonio Ramos Vs. Juzgado 2 Laboral Del Circuito De Cartago Valle

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos Al Trabajo Debido Proceso Igualdad Y Salud. Via De Hecho. Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Cesantias Intereses E Indemnizacion Por Despido Injusto. Contrato Verbal Para Trabajar En Finca. Solidaridad. Tutela Contra Providencias Judiciales. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia general para reclamar pago de acreencias laborales
  • Subsidiariedad
Derecho Al Trabajo
  • Inexistencia de perjuicio irremediable
Via De Hecho
  • Inexistencia en valoración de pruebas
  • Clases de defectos en la actuación
Contratista Indepediente
  • Prueba de la relación laboral con beneficiario de la labor contratada
7 topics · 10 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por el Tribunal Superior de Buga, Sala de Decisión Laboral, quien mediante sentencia del 29 de mayo de 2002 negó el amparo solicitado por el señor Gabriel Antonio Ramos.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaría General, líbrense las comunicaciones previstas en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.