JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 9, 2005

T-817 de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Orlando Cuello Gamez Vs. Comision Interinstitucional De La Rama Judicial

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho al debido proceso la igualdad y de acceso al desempeño de funciones y cargos publicos de aspirante a ocupar el cargo de director ejecutivo de administración judicial que atendiendo convocatoria de la comision inscribio su nombre pero fue excluido de la entrevista previa a la selección para efectos de la integración de la terna.

Solicita se le protejan sus derechos.

Carencia actual de objeto.

Circunstancias que generan la carencia actual de objeto.

Negada

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DECLARAR la carencia actual de objeto en la accion de tutela de la referencia.
  2. Segundo. REVOCAR, en consecuencia, las sentencias de Febrero 7 y marzo 16 de 2005, proferidas, respectivamente, por la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior de Bogota y por la Sala de Casacion Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaria General librense las comunicaciones previstas en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.