JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 19, 2002

T-785 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Adriana Parra Cruz Vs. Fiscalia 7 Seccional Unidad Nacional Anticorrupcion

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Unidad Familiar. Privacion De La Libertad. Solicitud Traslado Recluso Carcel Modelo A Ciudad Donde Reside Su Familia. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia del Consejo de Estado que denegó la tutela de los derechos a la unidad familiar de la señora ADRIANA PARRA, por las razones anotadas en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  2. Segundo. COMUNICAR la presente decisión al Tribunal Administrativo de Bolívar, para los efectos del artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  3. Comuníquese, notifíquese, cúmplase e
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.