JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 4, 2003

T-773 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Jose Francisco Landazury Angulo Vs. Registraduria Nacional Del Estado Civil

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud Correccion Documento De Identidad. Imposibilidad Notificacion De La Resolucion De Reconocimiento Pension De Vejez. Expedicion Duplicado Cedula De Ciudadania Con Numero Perteneciente A Otra Persona Y Nombres Incompletos. Oponibilidad Del Iss. Con
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Hecho superado por expedición de la cédula de ciudadanía y reconocimiento de pensión de vejez
Cedula De Ciudadania
  • Importancia para ejercer derechos fundamentales
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. LEVANTAR la suspension de terminos ordenada en el curso de este proceso.
  2. SEGUNDO. DECLARAR la carencia de objeto en la presente accion de tutela y CONFIRMAR la sentencia de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casacion Laboral, que denego la tutela de la referencia respecto de la peticion de la expedicion de un documento de identificacion con el numero 5.600.663 de Tumaco, pero por los motivos senalados en esta providencia.
  3. TERCERO. Por Secretaria General, librense las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.