JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 22, 2000

T-744 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Jorge Alfonso Camargo Rosado

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Trabajo Y Al Minimo Vital. Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Alcaldia Municipal De Arauca. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Procedencia excepcional pago de acreencias laborales
Derecho Al Trabajo En Condiciones Dignas Y Justas
  • Pago oportuno salarios de educadores
Partida Presupuestal
  • Gestión y distribución para pago oportuno de salarios
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR el fallo proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Primero. Promiscuo de Familia, en consecuencia, conceder la tutela al derecho trabajo y mínimo vital de los demandantes. Para ello se ordena al Alcalde de Arauca que en el término de cuarenta y ocho horas cancele los salarios y primas adeudadas a los accionantes siempre y cuando exista la debida partida presupuestal disponible. En caso contrario, deberá realizar las diligencias que le permitan cumplir con el pago ordenado. Dichas gestiones no podrán superar el término perentorio de tres (3) meses.
  3. Segundo. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.