JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 6, 2003

T-679 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Hector Alfonso Valderrama Leal Vs. Direccion Ejecutiva Seccional Boyaca Rama Judicial Y Otra

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Igualdad Y Trabajo. Prima Especial De Servicios Sin Carácter Salarial. 30% De La Asignacion Mensual. Trato Discriminatorio Entre Jueces Y Fiscales. Regimen Salarial Y Prestacional Para Empleados Publicos. Procedibilidad. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Idoneidad y eficacia para demandar Decreto
Prima Especial Para Empleados Y Funcionarios De La Rama Judicial
  • Con liquidación que se hace no existe perjuicio inminente
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (10 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR las sentencias proferidas por la Sala Especial de Conjueces del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santa Rosa de Viterbo, del 5 de marzo de 2003 y por el Juzgado
  2. Tercero. Civil del Circuito de Sogamoso del 6 de noviembre de 2002, y en su lugar DENEGAR la tutela interpuesta por Hector Alfonso Valderrama Leal contra la Direccion Ejecutiva Seccional de Boyaca Rama Judicial y la Pagaduria de la Direccion Ejecutiva Seccional de Boyaca Rama Judicial, por ser improcedente.
  3. Segundo. LIBRESE por Secretaria la comunicacion de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1.991, para los fines alli establecidos.
  4. MANUEL JOSE CEPEDA ESPINOSA
  5. Magistrado
  6. JAIME CORDOBA TRIVINO
  7. Magistrado
  8. RODRIGO ESCOBAR GIL
  9. Magistrado
  10. MARTHA VICTORIA SACHICA MENDEZ
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.