JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 12, 2000

T-679 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Jose Luis De Leon Gonzalez

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion Vida Salud Seguridad Social Y Minimo Vital. Pension De Invalidez. Concedida Parcialmente.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Medio De Defensa Judicial Ineficaz
  • Amenaza del mínimo vital
Proceso Ordinario Laboral
  • Reconocimiento de pensión de invalidez
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida el 2 de noviembre de 1999 por el Juzgado
  2. Cuarto. Laboral del Circuito de Santa Marta. En consecuencia, conceder la tutela en protección al mínimo vital y seguridad social del accionante.
  3. Segundo. ORDENAR al Instituto de Seguros Sociales, Seccional Santa Marta, que en el término de treinta (30) días estudie la situación del señor José Luis de León, y la posibilidad de concederle una pensión de invalidez en el evento en que, en criterios de los médicos y la junta calificadora de invalidez del Instituto de Seguros Sociales así lo estime.
  4. Tercero. Por Secretaría, líbrese, por Secretaría, las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.