JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 3, 1996

T-672 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Ramiro Davila

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Tramitacion De Querella Policiva. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Competencia En Proceso Policivo
  • Asunción arbitraria por secretario de gobierno
Via De Hecho En Proceso Policivo
  • Incompetencia del secretario de Gobierno
4 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la decisión de segunda instancia en la tutela de la referencia y en su lugar confirmar parcialmente la de primera instancia proferida por la Sala Penal del Tribunal de Santa Marta el 11 de abril de 1996. En consecuencia, se CONCEDE la tutela porque hubo violación al debido proceso en la tramitación de la querella policiva por parte del Secretario de Gobierno de Ciénaga, en el caso de José Hasbún contra Ramiro Dávila, quedando sin efecto todo lo actuado a partir del auto de 12 de enero de 1996 inclusive y se ordenar que se pase el expediente al Alcalde Municipal para que directamente aboque el conocimiento.
  2. Segundo. Para los efectos del artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, el Tribunal de origen hará las notificaciones y tomará las medidas adecuadas.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.