JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 13, 2003

T-216 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Martha Elena Peñates Diaz Y Otros Vs. Municipio De Sampues Sucre

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Minimo Vital Y De Familia De Docentes. Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Salarios Y Prestaciones (Vacaciones Dotacion Y Cesantias). Hecho Superado. Concedida Parcial.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Procedencia excepcional pago de acreencias laborales
  • Hecho superado por pago de acreencias laborales
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR las sentencias proferidas por la Unidad Judicial Municipal de Sampués - Sucre - y los Juzgados
  2. Segundo. y
  3. Tercero. Civil del Circuito de Sincelejo - Sucre - , dentro de la acción de tutela promovida por Martha Elena Peñates Díaz, Catherine del Rosario Luna Chima, Janeth Vergara Arroyo, Stella Isabel Molina Mercado, Jorge Antonio Villadiego Martínez, Carlos Martínez Martínez y Paola C. Martínez Martínez contra el Municipio de Sampués -Sucre -, pero por las consideraciones expuestas en esta sentencia.
  4. Segundo. Por Secretaria General, líbrese la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.