JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 28, 1996

T-668 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Ivan Buritica Hoyos Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Mora Judicial. Dilaciones Injustificadas. Fiscalia Regional De Cali. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Debido Proceso
  • Dilación injustificada de términos judiciales
Mora Judicial
  • Dilación injustificada
Tramite De Procesos
  • Falta de organización secretarial
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el fallo proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Primero. Penal del Circuito de Cali, el Once (11) de julio de 1996, que denegó la tutela presentada por los accionantes Iván Buriticá Hoyos, Liliana Franco Rengifo, Oscar Armando Franco Rengifo y otros, en contra de la Fiscalía Regional de Cali, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  3. Segundo. PREVENIR a la Fiscalía Regional de Cali y a la Secretaría Común de ésta misma ciudad, para que de conformidad con lo establecido por el artículo 24 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, se abstenga de incurrir en las omisiones materia de la acciòn de tutela.
  4. Tercero. LÍBRENSE por secretaría, las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
  5. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.