JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 8, 1999

T-664 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Eduardo Ariza Lacouture

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. Al Espacio Publico. Multa Por Estacionar En Zona Privada De Parqueo. Hotel Sicarare De Valledupar. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Juez De Tutela
  • Examen concreto de cada caso relacionado con situación colectiva
Accion Popular
  • Defensa de los derechos colectivos
Derechos Colectivos
  • Conexidad con derechos fundamentales hace procedente la tutela
  • Requisitos para su protección por tutela
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Legalidad de estacionamiento de vehículos en bahía que hotel señala como privada
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCASE el fallo proferido por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Valledupar, Sala Civil y de Familia, que confirmo el proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Primero. Civil del Circuito de Valledupar, dentro del proceso de tutela instaurado por Eduardo Ariza Lacouture, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de este fallo. En consecuencia, DEJANSE sin efecto las ordenes emitidas por estos despachos judiciales. En su lugar, DENIEGASE, por improcedente, el amparo solicitado por el mencionado ciudadano.
  3. Segundo. Por Secretaria General, librense las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.