JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 21, 2001

T-655 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Metilina Valdez De Madrid Vs. Gobernacion De Bolivar

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Vida Pension Minimo Vital Dignidad Seguridad Social Y Derecho De Peticion. Mora En La Emision Del Bono Impide El Acceso A Una Pension De Jubilacion A La Cual Tiene Derecho El Jubilado. Via De Hecho. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Bono Pensional
  • Expedición y emisión
  • Demora en emisión afecta derechos fundamentales
Via De Hecho
  • Se niega pensión por demora en emisión del bono
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casacion Laboral, el 15 de marzo de 2001 y, en su lugar, CONCEDER la tutela interpuesta por la senora Melitina Valdez de Madrid.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR al Instituto de Seguro Social, Seccional Bolivar, para que en el estricto termino de ocho (8) dias expida el acto administrativo correspondiente, en relacion con la solicitud de reconocimiento de la pension de vejez presentada por la demandante, conforme a lo expuesto en la parte motiva de esta sentencia.
  3. Tercero. ENVIESE copia de la presente providencia al Instituto de Seguros Sociales, Seccional Bolivar, Departamento de Pensiones.
  4. Librense por Secretaria, las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  5. Notifiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.