JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 31, 1999

T-641 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Fernando Chico Guarin

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Der. A La Igualdad. Solicitud De Reconocimiento De Pension Gracia. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Demanda De Tutela
  • Alcance de la no contestación
Derecho De Peticion
  • Pronta resolución
Acción De Tutela
  • Demostración de amenaza o vulneración de derechos fundamentales
Derecho De Petición
  • Núcleo esencial
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR, por las razones expuestas en la parte considerativa del presente fallo, la Sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Laboral del Circuito de Florencia - Caqueta, el dia 20 de abril de 1999.
  3. Segundo. CONCEDER la tutela para la proteccion del derecho de peticion del ciudadano Fernando Chico Guarin. En consecuencia, ordenar a la Caja Nacional de Prevision "Cajanal", que en el termino de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas contadas a partir de la notificacion del presente fallo, responda la solicitud de reconocimiento y pago de pension de gracia que le ha formulado el demandante.
  4. Tercero. SURTASE el tramite previsto en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.