JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 8, 2002

T-626 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Mary Luz Marin Alarcon Vs. Secretaria De Salud Del Tolima

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Salud Y Vida De Menor De Edad Con Mal Formacion Dermica. Solicitud Atencion Integral Segun Medicos Tratantes. Regimen Subsidiado. Sisben. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Administradora Del Regimen Subsidiado
  • Información al afiliado sobre posibilidad de atención en servicio no incluido en POS
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia del ocho (8) de marzo de dos mil dos (2002), del Juzgado
  2. Primero. Civil Municipal del Líbano - Tolima, en la acción de tutela pedida MARY LUZ MARIN ALARCÓN contra la Secretaría de Salud del Tolima. En consecuencia, CONCEDER la tutela impetrada, para la protección del derecho a la salud y la vida de una menor de edad.
  3. Para tal efecto, dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificación de esta sentencia, si aún no lo ha hecho, la Secretaría de Salud del Tolima, a través de la ARS correspondiente MARY LUZ MARIN ALARCON impartirá las autorizaciones encaminadas a que la niña Olga Dayana Marín Alarcón, sea atendida en forma integral en lo que su salud requiera y ordenen los médicos tratantes.
  4. Segundo. Líbrense por Secretaría, las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  5. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.