JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 26, 1997

T-615 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Celina Palacio De Moreno

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Vida Pago De Mesadas Atrasadas. Personas De La Tercera Edad. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Medio De Defensa Judicial Ineficaz
  • Pago oportuno de mesadas pensionales a persona de avanzada edad
Derecho A La Vida En Condiciones Dignas Y Justas
  • Pago oportuno y completo de mesadas pensionales
Pension De Jubilacion
  • Prelación de pago
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la decision proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Primero. Civil Municipal de Quibdo del diecisiete de julio de 1997 que denego la tutela iniciada por la senora CELINA PALACIOS DE MORENO contra la Gobernacion del Choco.
  3. Segundo. CONCEDER la presente tutela respecto de los derechos a la vida, salud y al pago oportuno de las mesadas pensionales, para lo cual se ordenara al Departamento del Choco, que el termino de los quince (15) dias siguientes a la notificacion de esta providencia, cancele a la demandante toda suma de dinero debida por concepto de las mesadas pensionales de jubilacion causadas hasta la fecha, a menos que ya se hubiere realizado, asi como el pago oportuno de las mismas en el futuro.
  4. Tercero. SURTASE el tramite previsto en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.