JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 12, 1995

T-609 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Isabel Ruiz De Mejia

✓
Topic · hard data
Libertad Religiosa. Der. Al Culto. Exhumacion De Cadaver. Negada
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Particulares
  • Administración de cementerio
Libertad De Cultos
  • Veneración de tumbas
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Contrato con administración de cementerio
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Confirmar el fallo proferido por la sala Civil del Tribunal Superior de Medellín de fecha 17 de agosto de 1995, mediante la cual se decidió negar la acción de tutela impetrada por la señora Isabel Ruíz de Mejía, contra el Parque Cementerio "Jardines Montesacro".
  2. Segundo. Líbrense por la Secretaría, la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.