JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 29, 1999

T-543 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Monica Patricia Fandiño Rodriguez

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Vida. Mora En El Pago De Salarios Atrasados. No Se Demostro El Perjuicio Irremediable. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia pago de salarios por no enfrentar riesgo inminente la subsistencia
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Pago de acreencias laborales
Prevencion A Municipio
  • Necesidad de asegurar disponibilidad presupuestal para pago de acreencias laborales
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Primero. Laboral del Circuito de Ciénaga el 16 de febrero de 1999.
  3. Segundo. PREVENIR al Alcalde del Municipio de Ciénaga, Magdalena para que, en adelante, tome las medidas pertinentes a fin de asegurar la disponibilidad presupuestal tendiente a la cancelación de las obligaciones contraidas con sus trabajadores, so pena de las sanciones legales correspondientes.
  4. Tercero. Por Secretaría General, LÍBRENSE las comunicaciones a que se refiere el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.