JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 17, 1998

T-504 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Sergio De La Cuesta Giraldo

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Der. De Defensa. Via De Hecho. Tutela Contra Providencias Judiciales. Se Dejaron De Practicar Pruebas. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Deberes De Las Partes Y Los Apoderados
  • Anotaciones marginales en expediente
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Práctica de pruebas decretadas
Via De Hecho
  • Completo y exhaustivo análisis de pruebas
Pruebas
  • Requisitos para solicitarlas son reglas imperativas
Testimonio
  • Señalamiento del domicilio y residencia
7 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación Penal, el día 22 de julio de 1998, al decidir la acción de tutela promovida por Sergio de la Cuesta Giraldo contra el Juez
  2. Segundo. Laboral del Circuito de Medellín.
  3. Segundo. Por Secretaría, líbrense las comunicaciones pertinentes, para los efectos señalados por el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  4. TERCERO. ENVIESE por Secretaría copia de esta providencia, al Juzgado
  5. Segundo. Laboral del Circuito de Medellín, para los fines pertinentes.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.