JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 6, 1997

T-498 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Andres Isabelino Renteria

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Solicitud De Reconocimiento De Pension Gracia. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Carácter excepcional de aplazamiento de respuesta
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia de 29 de mayo de 1997, proferida por el Juzgado cincuenta y siete Civil Municipal de Santa Fe de Bogotá.
  2. Segundo. CONCÉDESE la tutela pedida por ANDRES ISABELINO RENTERIA cuya petición de pensión gracia debe ser resuelta de fondo e íntegramente por la Subdirección de Prestaciones Económicas de CAJANAL dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificación de este fallo, a menos que ya se hubiese expedido la resolución correspondiente.
  3. Tercero. SE COMPULSAN copias a la Procuraduría General de la Nación para lo de su cargo, en relación con la responsabilidad disciplinaria de los servidores públicos que han ocasionado la mora en la respuesta al peticionario, desfigurando los alcances y el sentido del artículo 6 del Código Contencioso Administrativo.
  4. Cuarto. DESE aplicación al artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.