JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 28, 1994

T-480 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Ana Sanchez De Mutis

✓
Topic · hard data
Reconocimiento De Sustitucion Pensional. Caja Nal De Prevision. Der. De Peticion. No Existe Mora En La Admon Para Decidir. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sustitución Pensional
  • Improcedencia de reconocimiento por tutela
Derecho De Peticion
  • Pronta resolución
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMASE la sentencia proferida por la subsección B, de la Sección Segunda, del Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca, del día treinta (30) de junio de mil novecientos noventa y cuatro (1994).
  2. Segundo. LIBRESE la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.