JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 5, 2005

T-460 de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Oscar Octavio Castillo Baquero Vs. Alonso Perilla Rojas

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho Al Buen Nombre Y Accion De Tutela
  • Procedencia exige previa solicitud de rectificación
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho al buen nombre de persona por la divulgación de una deuda por el contraida a traves de un noticiero radial.

Solicita se ordene reparar su nombre y el de su familia.

Tutela contra particulares.

La procedencia de la tutela exige la previa solicitud de rectificación.

Este derecho se predica respecto de los medios masivos de comunicación como contrapartida de la amplia proteccion que les confiere la constitucion política en desarrollo de la libertad de prensa.

El actor no presento la respectiva solicitud verbal o escrita para que se le rectificara la noticia publicada sino que procedio a insturar la accion de tutela.

Negada

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida el 25 de enero de 2005 por el Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Promiscuo Municipal de Acacías, por las razones expuestas en la presente providencia.
  3. SEGUNDO. LÍBRESE por Secretaría las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.