JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 12, 1995

T-409 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Ricardo Castillo Beltran

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Salud. Falta De Conexidad. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Cirugia En Los Ojos. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud
  • Naturaleza prestacional
  • Fundamental por conexidad
  • Miopía
  • Uso de gafas
Derechos Prestacionales
  • Improcedencia de la tutela
2 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el fallo del 8 de febrero de 1995 proferido por el Juzgado 33 Penal del Circuito de Santafé de Bogotá, que a su vez revocó la sentencia del Juzgado 83 Penal Municipal de la ciudad, en virtud de la cual se había concedido la tutela impetrada.
  2. SEGUNDO. ORDENAR que por Secretaría General se comunique esta providencia en la forma y para los efectos previstos en el art. 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
  3. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.