JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 31, 1994

T-385 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Alirio Sarmiento Barrera

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Salud. Acceso De Los Campesinos A La Asistencia Hospitalaria. Ders Del Paciente. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. PRIMERO. Revocar las sentencias del Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Galan y del Juzgado Promiscuo del Circuito de Zapatoca, proferidas en la tutela de la referencia y en las cuales se denego la tutela impetrada por el solicitante.
  2. SEGUNDO. En su lugar se concede la tutela en el sentido de ordenar al Hospital Integrado de Galan: 1) que en el termino de 15 dias se diagnostique la real incapacidad de Alirio Sarmiento Barrera y en el evento que el paciente exija un grupo de examinadores diferente, el hospital lo remitira a otra institucion de las que integran el servicio hospitalario de Santander. 2) En el caso de que el brazo y la mano izquierda del trabajador agrario admitieran total o parcial recuperacion se proporcionara directamente o mediante colaboracion institucional, dentro de lo posible, el tratamiento medico y hospitalario inmediato y adecuado.
  3. TERCERO. Comuniquese al solicitante, al Director del Hospital de Galan, al Juez Promiscuo y al Personero de dicho municipio, al Defensor del Pueblo, al Ministerio de Salud y a la Superintendencia Nacional de Salud.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.