JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 9, 2003

T-381 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Jorge Ellery Lerma Agudelo Vs. Secretaria De Educacion Del Valle Del Cauca

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Educacion. Acceso A Establecimientos Educativos. Venta Materia De Educacion Fisicia A Particulares. Prevalencia Del Derecho Sustancial. Carencia Alctual De Objeto. Hecho Superado. Llamado A Prevencion. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Hecho superado
  • Protección derechos no alegados por el actor
Derecho A La Educación
  • Función social
  • No admite restricciones injustificadas
Prevalencia Del Derecho Sustancial
  • Omisión de mencionar todos los derechos vulnerados
3 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR el fallo proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Octavo. Civil del Circuito de Cali al negar la tutela interpuesta por JORGE ELLERY LERMA AGUDELO.
  3. Segundo. DECLARAR la carencia actual de objeto, por encontrarse un hecho superado, y en consecuencia no se imparte orden alguna.
  4. Tercero. Por Secretaria LIBRESE la comunicacion de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.