JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)April 5, 2001

T-374 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Alcira Josefa Diaz Nader Vs. Luis Carlos Mazo Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos De Defensa Participacion Politica Trabajo Y Debido Proceso. Desempeño De Cargos Publicos. Indebida Aceptacion Y Utilizacion De Falsa Renuncia Como Concejal. Tutela Transitoria. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Transitoria
  • Supone existencia de prueba sobre amenaza o vulneración de derechos constitucionales
Derecho Al Desempeño De Cargos Publicos
  • Supone derecho a renunciar al cargo
Derecho A La Libertad
  • Renuncia a un cargo público
Derecho De Defensa
  • Interposición recurso de apelación
6 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por el Consejo de Estado, Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo, Sección Segunda - Subsección "A", dentro de la acción de tutela instaurada por Alcira Josefa Díaz Nader contra Luis Carlos Mazo, Alcalde encargado, María Eugenia González Blanco, Presidenta del Concejo Municipal y Ramiro Blanco Pérez, Secretario del Concejo Municipal del municipio de Montelíbano (Córdoba).
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 de Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.