JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 2, 1998

T-324 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Ismael Bocanegra Cardozo

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Asociacion Sindical. Legitimacion Por Activa Del Sindicato. Descuentos Sindicales Que No Son Entregados Al Sindicato. Hecho Superado. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Asociación Sindical
  • Alcance
  • Entrega oportuna de cuotas por empleador
  • Definición
Medio De Defensa Judicial No Idoneo E Ineficaz
  • Entrega oportuna de cuotas sindicales por empleador
Sindicato
  • Entrega oportuna de cuotas por empleador
  • Legitimación para interponer tutela
3 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR, pero por las razones señaladas en este proveído, la sentencia de fecha tres de diciembre de 1997 emitida por la Sala Penal del Tribunal superior de Distrito Judicial de Ibagué.
  2. Segundo. PREVENIR a la Alcaldía y Tesorería Municipales de Ambalema (Tolima) para que en el futuro se abstengan de incurrir en conductas atentatorias de la libertad de asociación, y efectúen el pago de los aportes sindicales dentro de la oportunidad correspondiente.
  3. Tercero. Líbrese por la Secretaría General de esta Corporación, la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.