JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)April 3, 2003

T-287 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Andres Vargas Rodriguez Vs. Juzgado 29 Penal Del Circuito De Bogota.

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Debido Proceso. Principio De La Doble Instancia. Sentencia Anticipada Por Trafico De Estupefacientes. Renuncia Al Poder Por Apoderada. Falta De Notificacion. Investigacion Disciplinaria. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Poder
  • Juez debió aceptar renuncia
Recurso De Apelacion
  • Declaración de desierto por no sustentación
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Confirmar el fallo proferido por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bogotá - Sala Penal- de fecha 20 de Septiembre de 2002, por el cual denegó el amparo solicitado por el señor Andrés Vargas Rodríguez, exclusivamente por las razones expuestas en esta providencia.
  2. Segundo. Compulsar y enviar copia de esta providencia al Consejo Superior de la Judicatura, para que investigue la presunta falta disciplinaria en que pudieron incurrir tanto el Juzgado 29 Penal del Circuito de Bogotá como la apoderada del actor.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.