JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)April 29, 1999

T-285 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Luis Alfredo Rodriguez Mendez

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Salud Y A La Vida. Omision Del I.S.S. En Practica De Examen Por Falta De Planillas. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Vida
  • Práctica de examen para obtención de diagnóstico sobre enfermedad
  • Consecución de registro presupuestal o planillas
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia expedida por el Tribunal Superior de Cundinamarca el 16 de diciembre de 1998 y, en su lugar, tutelar el derecho a la salud del demandante en conexión con sus derechos constitucionales fundamentales a la vida y a la integridad física.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR al Instituto de Seguros Sociales que, dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificación de esta providencia, autorice al demandante la práctica del tac de tórax con biopsia dirigida por trucut que requiere para obtener un diagnóstico sobre su enfermedad.
  3. Tercero. Líbrense por Secretaria General de esta Corporación, las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.