JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 15, 1993

T-272 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Diego Lozano

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Buen Nombre. Derecho A La Honra. Debido Proceso. Cruz Roja. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la ley,
  2. IV. R E S U E L V E
  3. PRIMERO. Revocar la sentencia de fecha treinta y uno (31) de diciembre de mil novecientos noventa y dos (1992) proferida por el Juzgado
  4. Primero. Promiscuo de Familia de Cúcuta mediante la cual se negó la tutela de los derechos invocados por el demandante Diego Alejandro Lozano Gómez.
  5. SEGUNDO. Conceder la tutela de los derechos al buen nombre, honra y debido proceso, vulnerados con la decisión de la Cruz Roja, Seccional Norte de Santander y disponer que se reintegre al actor como cadete voluntario juvenil de dicha institución
  6. TERCERO. Comunicar la presente decisión al Juzgado del conocimiento para que se notifique a las partes, y adopte las medidas necesarias a efecto de adecuar su fallo a lo dispuesto por esta Corporación, según los términos del artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.