JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 28, 1997

T-260 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Eddis Celina Navarro De Ibañez

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Solicitud De Reconocimiento De Sustitucion Pensional. Cajanal. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Petición
  • Núcleo esencial
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. DECISION
  2. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia de 18 de diciembre de 1986 proferida por el Juzgado
  3. primero. Civil Municipal de Ocaña - Norte de Santander.
  4. Segundo. CONCEDER la tutela del derecho fundamental de petición. En consecuencia, ORDENASE a la Caja Nacional de Previsión Social que, si aún no lo ha hecho, resuelva la petición de la ciudadana EDDIS CELINA NAVARRO DE IBAÑEZ, dentro de las 48 horas siguientes a la notificación de la presente providencia, so pena de las sanciones contempladas en el Decreto 2591 para el desacato.
  5. Tercero. ORDENAR que, por medio de la Secretaría General de la Corporación, se envíe copia de esta sentencia a la Procuraduría General de la Nación, para lo de su competencia.
  6. Cuarto. LÍBRENSE, por la Secretaría General de la Corte Constitucional las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.