JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 20, 2003

T-236 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Jaime De Jesus Hoyos Gomez Vs. Salud Coomeva

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Salud Y Vida De Beneficiario Con Cancer. Solicitud Quimioterapias Y Tratamientos Pendientes. Atencion Medica Integral. Enfermedad Catastrofica. Planes Adicionales. No Renovacion Contrato De Medicina Prepagada. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Contrato De Medicina Prepagada
  • No renovación implicó vulneración de derechos fundamentales
  • Solo puede celebrarse o renovarse con personas afiliadas como cotizantes o beneficiarias del régimen contributivo
  • Aspectos que deben tenerse en cuenta en la relación contractual
1 topic · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. Revocar la sentencia proferida el 26 de agosto de 2002 por el Juzgado
  2. Octavo. Penal Municipal de Medellin y la sentencia proferida el 26 de septiembre de 2002 por el Juzgado Vigesimo
  3. Segundo. Penal del Circuito de Medellin.
  4. Segundo. Tutelar los derechos fundamentales a la salud y a la vida del actor Jaime de Jesus Hoyos Gomez. Ordenar a Salud Coomeva Medicina Prepagada S.A. responder por la atencion integral en salud demandada por el actor disponiendo la continuacion de las quimioterapias que se hallan pendientes y los tratamientos que le sean prescritos en razon de la enfermedad que padece.
  5. Tercero. Dese cumplimiento a lo dispuesto en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.