JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 9, 1993

T-219 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Francisco Javier Toro

✓
Topic · hard data
Libertad De Expresion. Libertad De Asociacion En Centros Carcelarios. Derechos De Los Internos. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

5 topics · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (7 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR los fallos de los Juzgados
  2. Primero. Penal Municipal y
  3. Segundo. Penal del Circuito de Calarcá, proferidos los días catorce (14) y veintinueve (29) de enero de mil novecientos noventa y tres (1993), respectivamente, y que denegaron la tutela solicitada por Francisco Javier Toro Alvarez.
  4. SEGUNDO. CONCEDER la tutela de los derechos a la libertad de expresión, libertad de enseñanza, reunión y libre asociación, del señor Francisco Javier Toro Alvarez.
  5. TERCERO. ORDENAR al Director de la Penitenciaria Rural de Peñas Blancas de Calarcá, permitir al Comité que preside Francisco Javier Toro Alvarez, reunirse en las aulas educativas del centro carcelario, y permitir que este pueda dictar cátedra o enseñar la Constitución Nacional y todo lo relacionado en materia de derechos humanos en las aulas educativas de este establecimiento carcelario, durante todo el tiempo que permanezca confinado, dentro de los horarios permitidos por los reglamentos.
  6. QUINTO. LIBRAR comunicación al Juzgado
  7. Primero. Penal Municipal de Calarcá, a efectos de que notifique esta sentencia a las partes y adopte las decisiones necesarias para adecuar su fallo a lo aquí dispuesto.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.