JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 23, 1999

T-179 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Daniel Restrepo Buitrago

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. Al Libre Desarrollo De La Personalidad. Der. A La Educacion. Corte De Cabello. Manual De Convivencia. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Reglamento Educativo
  • No puede desconocer libertades constitucionalmente consagradas
  • Supremacía normativa de la Constitución
  • No puede imponer patrones estéticos excluyentes
Derecho Al Libre Desarrollo De La Personalidad
  • Imposición de patrones estéticos excluyentes en institución educativa
3 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia del Tribunal Superior de Tunja, Sala Civil Familia, de fecha ocho (8) de octubre de mil novecientos noventa y ocho (1998.
  2. Segundo. CONCEDER la tutela interpuesta por el menor Daniel Restrepo Buitrago, por violacion a sus derechos fundamentales al libre desarrollo de la personalidad y a la educacion. En consecuencia, se ORDENA inaplicar el penultimo inciso del numeral 29 del Capitulo
  3. segundo. del "Manual de Convivencia de la Escuela Normal para Varones de Tunja", en aquella parte que exige "corte de cabello normal".
  4. Tercero. LIBRENSE por Secretaria General las Comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos alli previstos.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.