JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 24, 2005

T-167 de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Enereo Guerrero Gomez Vs. Molinos Guanayas

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Incapacidad Laboral
  • Solicitud directa al Seguro Social
Acción De Tutela
  • Naturaleza subsidiaria
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derechos de persona de la tercera edad que sufrio un accidente en la instalaciones de la demandada siendo atendido por la arp a la que se encontraba afiliado.

Solicita se ordene el pago de una ondemnizacion ya que no pudo continuar trabajando.

La accion de tutela contra particulares procede cuando se dan los elementos de la subordinación o indefension como lo señala el articulo 86 de la constitucion política.

El demandante no tiene comprometido su minimo vital y puede acudir ante la entidad de riesgos profesionales para obtener la prestación economica a que haya lugar.

Negada

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de San Martín de los Llanos (Meta), el 7 de octubre de 2004, en la acción de tutela interpuesta por Enereo Guerrero Gómez contra Rafael Ayala y Hermanos Propietarios de Molinos Guanayas.
  2. Líbrense por Secretaría, las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  3. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.