JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 22, 2000

T-153 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Hermes Urquijo Luna

✓
Topic · hard data
Cirugia De Oido A Menor De Edad. Eps Convida. Derecho A La Salud Es Fundamental Cuando Se Trata De Niños. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

5 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR el fallo del 8 de septiembre de 1999, proferido por el Juzgado 53 Civil Municipal de Santa Fe de Bogota, por medio del cual se nego la proteccion solicitada. En su lugar, se concede la tutela de los derechos a la vida, a la salud y a la seguridad social del nino Hermes Urquijo Vidales.
  2. En consecuencia, se ORDENA a "EPS Convida" que, en el termino de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas, contadas a partir de la notificacion de este fallo, si asi lo estima el medico tratante, o en la oportunidad que el lo indique, bajo su responsabilidad profesional, practique la cirugia coclear que requiere el paciente.
  3. Se inaplican para este caso, analizadas las circunstancias del menor, por resultar incompatibles con la Constitucion, el Decreto 806 de 1998 y la Resolucion 5261 de 1994 del Ministerio de Salud, que excluyen del POS la atencion del nino.
  4. Segundo. DESE cumplimiento a lo previsto en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.