JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 30, 2000

T-1466A de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Coldeportes Vs Credisocial Funza

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Salud Y Seguridad Social. Consignacion De Dineros Destinados Al Pago De Salarios Y No A Seguridad Social. Entidad En Proceso De Liquidacion. Negada
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia para restitución de dineros de entidades financieras por no tener carácter de contribuciones parafiscales
Sistema De Seguridad Social
  • Recursos tienen carácter parafiscal
Entidad Promotora De Salud
  • Recursos parafiscales no constituyen patrimonio
Proceso De Liquidacion Forzosa
  • Intervención de entidades financieras
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR, por las razones consignadas en esta providencia, el fallo proferido por EL JUZGADO SETENTA Y CINCO PENAL MUNICIPAL DE BOGOTA, de fecha 15 de junio de 2000, despacho que conoció en única instancia de la acción de tutela de la referencia, a través del cual negó por improcedente el amparo solicitado.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaría General, líbrense las comunicaciones a que se refiere el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.