JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 1, 2000

T-1153 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Ruth Andrade Vs Labotorio Jgb Y Accion S.A

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Trabajo A La Maternidad A La Dignidad De La Mujer Trabajadora Y Al Minimo Vital. Estabilidad Laboral Reforzada De Mujer Embarazada. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REVOCAR las decisiones objeto de revision y en su lugar CONCEDER la tutela por violacion a los derechos al trabajo, a la maternidad y a la dignidad de la mujer trabajadora, y al minimo vital.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR que a la senora Ruth Andrade se le paguen los salarios dejados de percibir hasta el 11 de enero del 2000.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaria librense las comunicaciones previstas en el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.