JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 21, 2003

T-1110 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Gloria Eugenia Valencia Ortega Vs. Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Antioquia

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos Al Debido Proceso Igualdad Y Trabajo. Solicitud Nombramiento En Cargo De Citadora A Quien Ocupo El Segundo Lugar. Actualizacion Y Reclasificacion Lista De Elegibles. Concurso De Meriros De La Rama Judicial. Ley Estatutaria De La Administracion De
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Carrera Judicial
  • Nombramiento debía hacerse de lista de elegibles actualizada
  • Integración de lista de elegibles
Registro De Elegibles
  • Posibilidad de reclasificación
  • Actualización
  • Conformación
Concurso De Meritos En La Rama Judicial
  • Aspectos en que se puede dar amparo por tutela
  • Aspectos que no se pueden resolver por tutela
3 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la decision proferida por la Sala Laboral del Tribunal Superior de Medellin el 18 de junio de 2003, dentro de la accion de tutela promovida por Gloria Eugenia Valencia Ortega contra la Sala Administrativa del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Antioquia.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR que por Secretaria General se de cumplimiento a lo previsto en el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.