JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 9, 1998

T-073 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Javier Gamboa Gutierrez

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion Frente A Entidad Privada Que Presta Un Servicio Publico. Ders. Fund. De Los Voluntarios. Cruz Roja. Tratamiento Y Atencion Medica. Resp. Civil Extracontractual. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Entidad De Asistencia Humanitaria
  • Deber de garantizar derechos de admitidos como voluntarios
Cruz Roja De Colombia
  • Suministro de elementos aptos para evitar accidentes o enfermedades
Deberes De La Persona
  • Procurar el cuidado integral de la salud
Principio De Solidaridad
  • Servicios médicos de prevención y rehabilitación
Responsabilidad Civil Extracontractual
  • Indemnización proporcional al daño causado por actividad peligrosa
6 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la Sentencia proferidas por el Consejo de Estado -Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo-, el catorce (14) de agosto de 1997,en relación con la acción de tutela instaurada por el señor Javier Gamboa Rodríguez.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR que por la Secretaría General de esta Corporación, se comunique esta providencia al h. Tribunal Administrativo de Norte de Santander (San José de Cúcuta), en la forma y para los efectos previstos en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  3. Notifíquese, cópiese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.