JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)January 22, 2004

T-032 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Teresa Emilia Gonzalez Maya Vs. Salud Colmena Medellin Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Salud Seguridad Social Y Vida. Solicitud Practica Examen De Pancreas Prescrito Por Medico Tratante Y Devolucion Sumas De Dinero. Ingreso Por Urgencias. Contrato De Medicina Prepagada. Carencia Actual De Objeto. Hecho Superado. Negada Parcia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Carencia actual de objeto por cuanto el examen médico ya se realizó
  • Improcedencia reembolso de dineros por asunción de costos médicos
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Reembolso de dineros por asunción de costos médicos
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el fallo proferido por el Juzgado Treinta y Dos Penal Municipal de Medellín del 08 de septiembre de 2003 que negó la tutela solicitada por Teresa Emilia González Maya, por las razones expresadas en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. LÍBRESE por Secretaría las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.