JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)January 23, 2003

T-015 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Hernan Hernandez Hernandez Vs. Municipio De Galeras Sucre

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Salud Y Seguridad Social. Solicitud Reembolso Sumas De Dinero Por Gastos Medicos De Esposa. Practica En Entidad Particular. Desafiliacion Sistema De Seguridad Social En Salud. Mora Pago De Aportes Por Empleador. Carencia Actual De Objeto. Lla
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia reembolso de dineros por asunción de costos médicos
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Reembolso de dineros por asunción de costos médicos
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REVÓCASE la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado Promiscuo del Circuito de Sincé- Sucre, que revocó el fallo del Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Galeras -Sucre, en la acción de tutela instaurada por el señor Hernán Hernández Hernández, en contra del Municipio de Galeras.
  2. PREVÉNGASE a la Alcalde del Municipio de Galeras, o a quien haga sus veces, que en el futuro se abstenga de incurrir en conductas que vulneren los derechos que le asisten tanto al actor como a sus beneficiarios.
  3. Segundo. Por Secretaría General, LÍBRENSE las comunicaciones a que se refiere el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.