JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)November 13, 2002Full bench

C-981 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Jorge Florez Gacharna

✓
Topic · hard data
Rendicion Provocada De Cuentas. Consecuencia Jurídica Por No Presentación Por El Demandado En Término Señalado
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Rendicion Provocada De Cuentas
  • Consecuencia jurídica por no presentación por el demandado en término señalado
  • Objeto
  • Oportunidad procesal de aceptación o no de cuentas presentadas
Rendicion De Cuentas
  • Naturaleza jurídica
  • Objeto
3 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Codigo de procedimiento civil.

Art. 418 num. 5.

Decreto 2282 de 1989.

Modificaciones.

Rendicion espontanea y provocada de cuentas.

Determinacion del quantum de lo debido.

Termino para presentarla.

Aplicación de reglas.

Naturaleza juridica.

Igualdad en el estado social de derecho

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1400/70. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 418Decreto 1400/70 «numeral 5»UPHELD
On the entire provisionDecreto 2282/89UPHELD
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el numeral 5 del articulo 418 del Codigo de Procedimiento Civil, cuyo texto es el siguiente:
  2. "Si el demandado no presenta las cuentas en el termino senalado, el juez, por medio de auto que no tendra recurso alguno, ordenara pagar lo estimado en la demanda. Este auto presta merito ejecutivo"
  3. Notifiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.