JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)November 7, 2007Full bench

C-925 de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Julio Ernesto Hencker Arcila

✓
Topic · hard data
Fallo Inhibitorio Por Ineptitud De Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Contra Normas Para La Proteccion Laboral Y Social De La Actividad Periodistica Y De Comunicacion
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Inhibicion De La Corte Constitucional
  • Ineptitud sustantiva de la demanda
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 1016 de 2006 (parcial) y la ley 18 de 1989 (parcial).

Se adoptan nomas legales con meros propositos declarativos para la proteccion laboral y social de la actividad periodistica y de comunicacion a fin de garantizar su libertad e independencia profesional y se establecen requisitos y condiciones en el desempeño de la divulgacion y prensa de los ministerios departamentos administrativos superintendencias establecimientos publicos y unidades administrativas especiales del orden nacional.a juicio del demandante las expresiones de las normas acusadas violan los articulos 20 23 26 73 y 74 de la constitucion.ineptitud sustantiva de las demandas de inconstitucionalidad.

En la presente demanda se evidencian deficiencias que impiden un pronunciamiento de fondo.inhibida

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 18/89. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 1Ley 18/89 «Parágrafo único.»DECLINED TO RULE
On the entire provisionLey 1016/06DECLINED TO RULE
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Declararse INHIBIDA para pronunciarse sobre la constitucionalidad de la Ley 1016 de 2006, en las expresiones demandadas, lo mismo que sobre la constitucionalidad del parágrafo único del artículo 1 de la Ley 18 de 1989.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.