JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)October 22, 2002Full bench

C-893 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Ernestor Rey Cantor

✓
Topic · hard data
Facultades Extraordinarias. Asuntos De Carácter Sancionatorio En Materia Administrativa
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Control De Constitucionalidad De Facultades Extraordinarias
  • Constitución vigente al momento del otorgamiento
Entidades De Recaudo De Impuesto
  • Errores de verificación
Facultades Extraordinarias
  • Asuntos de carácter sancionatorio en materia administrativa
  • No sujeción a restricciones temáticas o temporales en la Constitución de 1886
Proposicion Juridica Completa
  • No integración por autonomía y significado normativo propio
6 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Decreto extraordinario 624 de 1989.

Arts. 674 675 676 677 y 678.

Estatuto tributario de impuestos administrados por la direccion general de impuestos nacionales.

Errores de verificacion.

Recepcion declaraciones.

Recaudo de impuestos.

Cancelacion autorizaciones

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 624/89. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 674Decreto 624/89UPHELD
Art. 675Decreto 624/89UPHELD
Art. 676Decreto 624/89UPHELD
Art. 677Decreto 624/89UPHELD
4 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Declarar EXEQUIBLES los articulos 674 a 678 del Decreto 624 de 1989, por el cargo propuesto en esta demanda.
  2. Segundo. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la sentencia C-506 de 2002, en relacion con el articulo 678 del Estatuto Tributario.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.