JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)August 8, 2001Full bench

C-833 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Ivan Dario Gomez Lee

✓
Topic · hard data
Junta Seccional De Escalafon Docente. Inexistencia De Facultades Disciplinarias
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Docente
  • Aplicación del CDU
Educacion
  • Inspección y vigilancia del Estado
Establecimiento Educativo
  • Inspección y vigilancia por el Estado
Junta Seccional De Escalafon Docente
  • Inexistencia de facultades disciplinarias
Juntas De Escalafon Docente
  • Presencia de delegado del Ministerio de Educación
6 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Decreto 2277 de 1979.

Arts. 14 17 y 19 (ps.).

Ejercicio de la profesion docente.

Ley 115 de 1995.

Arts. 120 y 122.

Ley general de educacion.

Decisiones de la junta nacional de escalafon docente.

Conformacion.

Regimen disciplinario.

Autonomia territorial.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 2277/79. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 15Decreto 2277/79DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 17Decreto 2277/79 «numeral 6, 7»DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 120Ley 115/94 «literal d y e»DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 122Ley 115/94UPHELD
4 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Declararse inhibida de pronunciarse sobre el artículo 14; los numerales 6 y 7 del artículo 17; la expresión demandada del artículo 19 del Decreto 2277 de 1979; y, los literales d) y e) del artículo 120 de la Ley 115 de 1994.
  2. Segundo. Declarar exequibles, por los cargos examinados, el numeral 2 del artículo 17 del Decreto 2277 de 1979; y 120, literales a), b) y c), y 122 de la Ley 115 de 1994.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.